This week we covered assessment. Something I found interesting
was what the curriculum teaches us about assigning grade levels. For instance,
how many of you knew that by meeting the curriculum expectations, a student
would receive a level 3? Prior to teachers college, I always thought if you met
all of the expectations, you would receive a level 4. However, what we have
learned is that you can only assign a level 4 if the student goes above and
beyond the expectations.
Ministry of Education. (2005). The Ontario Curriculum Grades 1-8 Mathematics. Retrieved from: http://www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/curriculum/elementary/math18curr.pdf
Another interesting point was the research that was
discussed surrounding grades and comments. How many of you can admit that you
are concerned about the grade when you submit a piece of work? I know this is
something I personally care a lot about. The first thing I look for is the
grade I received, followed by comments on how I can get a better grade on the
next assignment. However, research has proven that if a teacher reveals a grade
to a student, they have a zero percent likelihood of improving on their next
assignment or test. In contrast, when teachers left comments on the student’s
work, with no grade anywhere to be found, students were at a 30 percent more
likelihood of improving the next time. This increase in likelihood of achieving
higher results is a significant amount. What does this show us then? How should
we mark students work? Well, what the research has shown is we should be
recording marks for our eyes only, and only letting students have access to the
comment portion of the marking component. To compare, the research has shown
that if the teacher records a mark alongside the comment, the student returns
to a zero percent likelihood of achieving higher results next time. This is
because students place more emphasis and care on the grade, as opposed to the
feedback that they are being given.
Kevin Hodgson. (October 11, 2015). Hit with the growth mindset. Retrieved from: https://www.flickr.com/photos/dogtrax/22075424832
Knowing this now, what are some strategies we can use when
leaving feedback for students? Well, students respond well to compliments,
though we cannot leave it at just a compliment, as this will encourage a fixed
mindset, which is to be avoided. Instead, provide your student with a
compliment about a strength you see in their work, a “wonder” component where
you question something about the work, and a challenge you saw. This way, the
student leaves the comment with a growth mindset, and they can leave with
useful advice on how they can improve for next time.
We took part in an activity in today’s class that
demonstrated our ability to leave descriptive feedback on student work. We were
encouraged to find at least two ways that a student might solve the problem. After
solving the two EQAO questions each, we had to work together in our table
groups to look at how a student solved these questions. Whether the student got
the question right or wrong, we had to dissect their work to see what their strengths
and challenges were, as well as an “I wonder” component.
The image above shows how I answered the two questions that
were assigned, whereas the bottom image shows how Ross and I dissected the student’s
answer and provided feedback for their work.
Overall, the main points to take away are these:
1.
Always leave a strength, “wonder” and challenge
when leaving descriptive feedback;
2.
Make sure your feedback demonstrates a growth
mindset;
3.
Leave comments on student’s work as opposed to
grades/comments and grades as this will result in a higher rate of improvement;
4.
Level 4 is for the students that go above and
beyond the expectations.














